What Most RFP Response Workflows Get Wrong

If you’ve ever submitted a polished, on-time RFP response… and still lost the deal, this might be why.

Most teams think the hardest part of the RFP process is answering the questions. But the truth is, getting the answers in isn’t the same as winning the deal.

In reality, your proposal often gets passed around internally—to legal, procurement, finance, IT—without you in the room to explain it. If your RFP response doesn’t account for that internal journey, it’s already at a disadvantage.

Let’s break down what most RFP workflows get wrong—and how to fix it.

Mistake #1: Focusing on Completion Over Clarity

A lot of teams treat RFPs like checklists: answer every question, double-check compliance, hit submit. Done.

But your buyer still has to sell it internally.

That means:

• Legal needs to understand your risk posture
• IT needs to trust your security claims
• Finance needs to see value and ROI
• Decision-makers need a clear business case

If your RFP response is only designed to be submitted—not to be used—you’re making your champion do too much work.

Mistake #2: Writing for Reviewers, Not Advocates

When teams default to template-style answers or technical copy-paste, they create responses that are accurate—but not helpful.

Great RFP responses are:

• Structured for readability
• Tailored to different stakeholder types
• Framed in business outcomes, not just features

The best RFP software helps teams adapt answers based on audience—so your proposal becomes an internal enablement tool, not just a technical doc.

Mistake #3: Ignoring the Post-Submission Workflow

Here’s what often happens after an RFP is submitted:

• Your champion forwards the doc to stakeholders
• Stakeholders skim it without context
• Questions get bounced back to the SE
• Delay, confusion, or worse—loss of deal momentum

If your RFP response process stops at delivery, you're missing the most critical part of the buyer journey.

A modern workflow should include:

• Forwardable content for different stakeholder types
• Clear ownership on follow-ups (without pinging five people)
• Context baked into responses so they’re self-explanatory

What a Modern RFP Workflow Should Enable

To win more, your RFP strategy has to support more than submission. It should drive internal alignment, reduce friction, and increase confidence.

Look for processes (and tools) that enable you to:

• Surface contextually relevant answers—not just reuse content
• Frame responses in language legal, finance, and IT can use
• Track version history and ownership without side threads
• Reduce SME burnout by scaling the answers they’ve already approved

Because in a high-stakes deal, clarity is just as important as speed.

‍